(3) Efficiency
Informatization is not a small sum of investment, domestic and some business investments in the information above is 10-bit numbers, the implementation of ERP must be evaluation of the benefits and rewards, which is self-evident. You can note the following:
* To achieve the desired objectives of the project of the economic indicators.
In the expected recovery time, the system investment.
(4) Consolidation of measures to
Implementation of the ERP system is a management revolution is a revolution, there exists the risk of restoration and retrogression, is there consolidation measures is a very important aspect. After "acceptance" let the matter rest after the project are not uncommon. Can stick to the project important indicator of success, consider the following factors:
• Establish a compound of talent, there is loss of control of the business backbone measures.
• Establish guidelines and working procedures of work and has been strictly enforced.
* There is a training of trainers, there are enterprises with the actual preparation of training materials, the proportion of employees receiving training expanded.
* Put forward the next stage of work proposals, with new goals; the pursuit of excellence knows no boundaries.
ABCD assessment method deficiencies
Someone whether the foreign MRP II ABCD-level evaluation criteria to measure "success." Foreign ABCD rating, is the American Production and Inventory Control Society (APICS) the recommendations made by some experts, not APICS association standards, not the industry standard. ABCD evaluation of the enterprise to check the results of the implementation of self-assessment, is the conduct of business, not government action. ABCD evaluation of the content is only limited to the effect of MRP II implementation, incomplete it is necessary to key performance indicators.
According to foreign experts, rated A-MRP II business, not as through the ISO 9000 certification did not mean to get a pass to enter the international market. Successful implementation of MRP II many foreign companies are not keen on ABCD appraisal; so, statistics show that A-and B-class companies for the percentage is too small and not comprehensive.
However, ABCD evaluation methods are still many places where you can learn from, such as:
1 ABCD checklist already has a "balanced scorecard" of the embryo, that is, sub-categories, taking into account strategic and tactical, financial and non-financial, high-and low-rise, as fully as possible.
2 MRP II system is composed of three management levels, and therefore, different levels of management have different evaluation indicators, to achieve clearly-defined responsibilities. Several of these were related to the accuracy of basic data, examination of the department responsible for maintaining the data.
Examination consists of three, "implementation of performance appraisal" and "management standard assessment," in two parts. The former is mainly on the viability and completion rates, data accuracy, as well as delivery, quality, speed, cost and so the percentage of completion. The latter is mainly answered in training, data preparation, applications, and other aspects of the general operation of the questions raised by a "yes" or "no" answer score. Percentage terms, and the answer is to say there are two kinds of assessment forms.
The original MRP II of the ABCD performance evaluation system does not emphasize high standards of project objectives and positioning. ABCD evaluation method of the table entries too much to implement them is very cumbersome. Therefore, how to judge the success or failure of ERP projects, but also constant innovation of domestic enterprises and put forward a new program with the times.
ERP project affect the success or failure of a number of factors, there are deficiencies, but also undernourished. Interested readers can refer to the new book "ERP - Integration starting from the inside" (Second Edition) The third part of the "project management and ERP implementation" in the relevant chapters.
|
