Home | About Us |ERP Implementation| ERP Projects | Want Website Like This | Links | News | Contact Us
About ERP, Enterprise Resource Planning, ERP Software,
::ERP Softwares::

 

Overview ERP
Overview ERP
Overview ERP
Overview ERP
Overview ERP
Overview ERP
Overview ERP
Overview ERP
Overview ERP
Overview ERP
Overview ERP
Overview ERP

 

ERP Office Home Page

Authority should commensurate with responsibility, authority to the subordinate, responsibility each person


1 1. Authority should commensurate with responsibility. T .- Tree of authority granted to the subordinate should be in proportion to Be tonics assigned. It is not correct lo say that antlloritN shot71d be equal to re. difi a person can never be given exactly a s much authontN as the assl- n =- acre some authority has to be withheld and cannot be delegated. FDr ax_= a director of personnel delegates responsibility for wage and salary - - to the manager of wage and salary but he must withhold authors.rail planning, orgauisahon, coordination motivation and contra re7zg to personnel. Authorih can be delegated commensurate NN ith ream .
2. Responsibility cannot he relegated. When the deieg lutes authority to the subordinate, responsibility for accotnpltsl mer.r -iii Ads inch lute The person ma the delegation ahvays remains acco- --e i. r is superiors for that which: he has delegated. Since respmrsiln.li.., No c. be delegated, the delegator is accountable for the acts of suborder- -e r. r xnch rigidity of principle can be modified by common sense in m rti .zr inst.mce.
3. There should be m7 dual subordination. For delcEa co an TtN a :d responsibility each person should be accountable on v to or.e Signor it' a subordinate reports to two superiors on the same respons.bf ire _omu,iu friction inevitably result. In case of dual responsibilih the suar7irnc is never sure which superior will ask hhn to account for n hi h --MUNCIE. act N at. Since demands, of different supenors can be different. he can Eel ssfN two different bosses even if he tnay hand e the problems ir. z NN Rammer whatsoever The subordinate may receive conflicting orders ar d may not be able to pie 7se any boss.
Nt'ui'l- he ca n easily delegate, ire NN'i.l ford hirrrscif buried in . outir;- u -.; i 3 OiZ the othei ire id. he delegates responsibility anei arrthorhy al clr he si d
exercise Irirnself it will jeopardize his leadership and bring disorgansai.cr and conflicts To avoid the two extremes tlrc rnaoagcr should ana JN se his iob and deLennine: ;
(i) tasks wlticll cannot be delegated (job of plan,oi!lg controlling, policy ma and coordination cannot be delegatedJ.
(pi) tasks which can be delegated to others (tlie job of adniinistrati r of tlicies can be delegated),
(ii) tasks NN loch are of routine nature and rir;rst be delegated
T he N. ork of routine natl;re7.whicll does not relate to pQ!iey ma or cc strop a_ should t e delegated. A large part of cxecutivc's work consists of
ctitities which are subsidiary- to Irisprintary task, for exarr.ple, the work like -hat of grarrting sanction etc. with the framework ol'laid down policies should A- delegated
There are certain tasks Which can be delegated but with care These' relate to arimiilistr;iticTr of policies, Where the policies Itave been decided beforehand and they have to be irilpieinented only; such work can be delegated it is essential that even such tasks should be dclega(ed only if the manager has confidence DT his subordinates and the snbordi!tates has e been properly !rainied to accept those responsibilities,


 
 
 



 
 
ERPwordsd
Technical Dictionary
 
 Page copy protected against web site content infringement by Copyscape
 All Content On This Web Site Are Copyrighted Reserved © 2008 by jason john onwer of abouterp.com